US Men's Grand Slam Drought Isn't Taylor Fritz's Burden to Bear
I possess a few opinions about the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.
Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?
Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories
The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite delivery and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his potential.
Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men winning major titles when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.
The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.
Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of chances to break. But the champion saved break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.
The match was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.
The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)
Year-End Championships: Player Divisions
American legend Group
- The Spanish phenom
- Taylor Fritz (US)
- The Australian speedster
- Lorenzo Musetti (It)
Bjorn Borg Group
- Jannik Sinner (It)
- Alexander Zverev (Ger)
- The rising American
- The Canadian talent
“I would likely dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually highly improbable for all other players. {